Because they were taken-apparently by a hillside paparazzo-and published without Pitt’s knowledge or consent, they were an invasion of privacy and exploited his image, which is his alone to publicize, the lawyer said.īut Raygor argued on Playgirl’s behalf that the magazine had not commissioned the photos and therefore had not invaded Pitt’s privacy. Lavely argued that the photographs and accompanying story were not newsworthy. Playgirl Pics Cfnm Hot Girls Wallpaper Playgirl Pics Cfnm Hot Girls Wallpaper Playgirl Cfnm Couples Favorite Hunks & Other Things: Favorite Fashion CFNM.
Playgirl magazine photos free#
The court case, which includes an unresolved lawsuit that Pitt filed against the magazine, places two fundamental rights at odds: The magazine’s constitutionally guaranteed right to free speech, and Pitt’s right to privacy.
“Many fewer people would have become exposed, as it were, to this issue were it not for the litigation itself,” Mirell said. Already ads have appeared offering to sell copies for $50 or more. The dispute drew attention to the photographs and made the issue a hot collectors item. “It is not the prerogative of any judge in this state to try to stuff the cat back in the bag.” “He’s issued an unenforceable order,” Mirell said. Raygor said the magazine sold out within days of O’Brien’s first order and already had been mailed to subscribers when Pitt filed suit. O’Brien also ordered the magazine to recall its August issue from vendors and inform them that they are banned from selling or distributing it, the lawyers said. Discover the growing collection of high quality Most Relevant XXX. The photos showed Pitt and actress Gwyneth Paltrow cavorting in the nude outside a hotel bungalow on a Caribbean island two years ago. Watch Vintage Magazine Nude Playgirl Photos porn videos for free, here on. The judge’s order Thursday made the earlier newsstand ban permanent and went even further, Raygor said. Last month, O’Brien ordered Playgirl to halt distribution of its August issue featuring the cover story and headline, “Brad Pitt Nude!” Playgirl’s lawyer, Kent Raygor, contended that 1st Amendment issues were involved and that the ruling “censors the public’s right to see information that is newsworthy and of great public interest.” Playgirl Inc.“They could have printed those nude pictures on a coffee mug or T-shirt and it would have been the same,” Lavely said. and European magazines and are available on the Internet. Pitt is suing for invasion of privacy and intentional infliction of emotional distress, claiming the pictures were taken by a trespassing photographer during a vacation two years ago.Īt the hearing on the restraining order, Raygor countered that Pitt has no valid claim because the photos were previously published in U.S. “It’s unusual to have an order that is sealed,” Raygor noted, adding that because the order is sealed he was limited in his ability to discuss the case. Judge Robert O’Brien granted Pitt’s request for a temporary order restraining further sale of the magazine, but refused Pitt’s request to recall issues which had already been delivered. Records have since been sealed and the action removed to the federal District Court in Los Angeles.Ī July 29 hearing on the matter was cancelled once the action was removed to the federal court, which had not set a new court date as of July 23, according to Playgirl counsel Kent Raygor. Pitt blocks distribution of Playgirl magazineĬALIFORNIA–In mid-July, a Los Angeles Superior Court judge ordered Playgirl magazine to discontinue distribution of its August edition, which includes nude photos of actor Brad Pitt.
0 kommentar(er)
